Re: MD The S/O divide

From: skutvik@online.no
Date: Wed Sep 03 2003 - 09:23:58 BST

  • Next message: skutvik@online.no: "RE: MD The S/O divide"

    Jonathan, Platt and Scott.
    31 Aug. Jonathan wrote:
     
    Scott originally:
    > > > This is why I say that the S/O divide should be seen as a case of
    > > > the DQ/SQ divide. It's too ingrained in us to be called a *static*
    > > > pattern of value.
     
    Platt commented:
    > > How "ingrained" something is has no effect on its being a static
    > > pattern. The laws of physics are pretty well ingrained yet still
    > > static patterns of the inorganic level. But, the S/O divide, if we
    > > agree it is a static social pattern, can be said to be seen as "a case
    > > of the DQ/sq divide, or perhaps less abstractly, a case (pattern) in
    > > the MOQ moral hierarchy.

    The S/O divide - its emergence and growth - is described in ZMM and
    even if you don't accept the SOL (that the S/O is intellect itself) you at
    least see the SOM as an (one) intellectual pattern ..don't you? So why
    suddenly social?

    Scott's suggestion of the S/O as a dynamic/static case I have
    commented on earlier.

    Jonathan says:
    > I dissent on both counts:
    > 1. "Ingrained" and "static" are synonyms, both meaning resistant to
    > change. 2. I don't see the S/O divide as a social pattern. It is an
    > (intellectual) description of perception AT ALL LEVELS.

    I agree about the ingrained part and also (with qualifications) about
    S/O as "...an intellectual description of perception at all levels".
    Intellect has the privilege of "describing" the rest of existence, but I
    wonder what other "intellectual descriptions ...etc". are like? Just one
    example please.
     
    > IMHO, what Pirsig has done is to LIBERATE the S/O divide from a
    > metaphysical straightjacket.

    Agree!

    > According to my understanding of the
    > quality idea, the S/O division is no longer a fixed, absolute
    > dichotomy that defines the bounds of reality; it is a
    > dynamically-assigned division that can help describe experience.
     
    The S/O divide a "dynamically-assigned division". Well, weren't all
    quality levels once dynamically assigned? And "..help describe
    experience" ...of course, intellect offers the best description of
    experience ...until the MOQ that is.

    Sincerely
    Bo

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 03 2003 - 09:24:52 BST