From: Horse (horse@darkstar.uk.net)
Date: Mon Feb 23 2004 - 13:28:10 GMT
Hi Bo
On 23 Feb 2004 at 9:25, skutvik@online.no wrote:
> Yes, this is the very point: The MOQ is no intellectual "pattern". It
> began as one, but grew too big for its intellectual nest!
This seems to be where you seem to be departing from the majority on the list and the author
of the MoQ.
The Metaphysics of Quality is a Metaphysics and thus an intellectual pattern of value. This is
so for all metaphysical systems.
If the MoQ has grown too big for its "intellectual nest" then it is no longer a metaphysical
system. If this is the case, and you say this is so, what then is the MoQ?
The other place you depart from what most assume to be correct is that you deny an
intellectual level to anything that did not grow out of the Greek/Athenian system of
philosophical thought. This is very odd and is something I do not accept.
I think you've gotten something very mixed up
Horse
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 23 2004 - 13:23:44 GMT