From: MBSJ79@aol.com
Date: Wed Feb 25 2004 - 23:57:52 GMT
That's exactly what I am talking about. BUT - music and art should NOT be the
only subjects that shouldn't be ranked. What about religion? What about a
food or movie critic? What about polictical issues?
I mean, these things are already "ranked". You can use the argument of
"survival of the fitest" but that STILL does not make it any more rational than
it is now. If we continue to "rank" anything then all we are doing is living
up to simple static patterns....right?
Everyone???
not that it matters much...are you going to go out and listen to something or
see something that you normally wouldn't have just because someone or
someones say(s) it's better than what you like? perhaps. are you going to like it?
not necessarily. besides, i think Quality is deeper than language, and therefore
deeper than "rank", if you know what i mean. take the word "ineffable", for
example. it had to be invented for some reason...
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 26 2004 - 00:18:39 GMT