From: David MOREY (us@divadeus.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Sat Mar 27 2004 - 19:57:08 GMT
Matt said: But then I think you have to reformulate the distinctions I'm
making into something like "conceptions of the good the gov't can pass laws
about" and "conceptions of the good the gov't can't pass laws about."
DM: Hi, this makes me think, the problem is that we do not have any
democratic social representation/forums
to discuss our societies in terms of goods/social goals. My problem is less
with government and the trivial
problems of making laws, what I want to debate is values/goals i.e. those
things that should determine what our
governments do. At the moment this is done by an unelected media, often
under the influence of certain wealthy
minorities. I propose, the people take control of the media, the government
is has no power.....
----- Original Message -----
From: "MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT" <mpkundert@students.wisc.edu>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: MD secular humanism and dynamic quality
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 27 2004 - 20:04:35 GMT