Re: MD Religion of the future.

From: Joe (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Sun Apr 25 2004 - 19:20:47 BST

  • Next message: Matthew Poot: "Re: MD Religion of the future."

    On 24 April 2004 2:57 PM DMB, quoting Wilber, writes

    dmb says:
    It seems that a number of posters are interested in the future of religion
    and I think Pirisg's MOQ can help us imagine it. Even better is Ken Wilber's
    THE MARRIAGE OF SENSE AND SOUL. The subtitle is "Integrating Science and
    Religion". Not only does it address the issue in detail, it does so from a
    perspective that parallels and supports the MOQ. Here he boldly expresses
    the same basic idea that Mark and the two Daves have expressed...

    > "...most of those premodern beliefs and functions of religion are no
    longer
    > sustainable in modern consciousness (except among those who remain at a
    > premodern level of development). Mythology will not stand up to the
    > irreversible differentiations of modernity; it confuses prerational with
    > transrational; it fosters regressive ethical and cognitive modes; it hides
    > from any sort of validity claims and actual evidence; and thus avoiding
    > truth, is left only with power as one of its prime motives. ..This is why
    > the Enlightenment, as Habermas points out, always understood itself as a
    > COUNTERFORCE TO MYTHOLOGY. The clarion call of the Enlightenment was for
    > EVIDENCE, not for myths..." Emphasis and parenthetical info is Wilber's.

    Hi DMB, and all,

    joe: DMB, I have always considered you the champion of mystical experience!
    Thank You!

    I do not consider SOUL to be mystical experience. It seems to be a pattern
    of SOM. IMO marriage is a mystical union, not just a social contract. What
    do I consider mystical? At the marriage feast of Cana, the water changing
    to wine was mystical understanding, wine, coherence, replacing the pattern,
    water, knowledge, static. (I accept that an excess of wine leads to
    incoherence.) IMO The MOQ accepts dq as mystical experience.

    Why worry about: "The clarion call of the Enlightenment was for EVIDENCE,
    not for myths?" Maybe Wilber is standing on his pulpit. He is not so much
    interested in mystical experience, as dogma.

    Joe

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 25 2004 - 19:19:08 BST