From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Tue Jun 22 2004 - 16:15:01 BST
Mark 22-6-04: Hi Gav,
Thanks for a positive response.
Coherence in the MOQ is explored in, 'The edge of chaos' found at the MOQ.org
essay page. Any comments would be most welcome.
hey mark,
interesting stuff.
--- Valuemetaphysics@aol.com wrote: > The Question of
Organization for the Situationist
> International
> Guy Debord, April 1968
> Translated by Point Blank, 1972
>
> 8. Since we have never considered the SI to be a
> goal in itself, but as a
> moment of historical activity, the force of things
> now leads us to prove it. The
> "coherence" of the SI is the relationship, directed
> towards coherence, between
> all the theses that have been formulated, between
> them and our action, as
> well as our solidarity on many, but not all, of the
> questions about which each of
> us must engage the responsibility of others. It
> cannot be a kind of mastery
> that is guaranteed to anybody, because this person
> would then gain the
> reputation of having acquired our theoretical bases
> so well that he [sic] would
> automatically glean an exemplary line of conduct
> from them. It cannot be a demand
> for an equal excellence of all on all questions or
> operations, and even less can
> it be a recognition of such excellence.
>
> 9. Coherence is acquired and verified by egalitarian
> participation in the
> totality of a common practice, which simultaneously
> reveals mistakes and supplies
> remedies -- this practice requires formal meetings
> to arrive at decisions,
> the transmission of all information, and the
> examination of all stated failures.
sounds like praxis (complementary theory and practice)
and participative democracy....you think?
Mark 22-6-04: I need to explore the situationists. Have made note of the two
texts you recommend and will go from there?
I read your comment here in MOQ terms: Theory - Static Intellectual Quality,
Practice - DQ in relationships. In terms of coherence, this suggests to me
high Quality Intellectual patterns aim at coherence between the social and
intellectual levels. It's an aesthetic more than a structure i suppose. This is
where SOM has failed; too much structure, no aesthetic feel for social Quality.
Participative democracy requires the free flow of information for it to work,
and not simulation don't you feel? The effects of simulation have been felt
in this forum recently in shocking clarity. Do people really believe that stuff
and believe themselves to be free?
i looked into coherence a few years ago but in a
physics sense. i must admit not all of it sunk in,
perhaps you can give me some examples of coherence,
perhaps at various levels.
cheers
gav
Mark 22-6-04: If we examine physical coherence in MOQ terms then it appears
there may be biological, social and intellectual analogues. The examination of
physical coherence and biological coherence got me thinking about this in the
first place.
ps know what you mean re sartre and de beauvoir. the
roads to freedom trilogy is pretty good (well so far
as i have got - book 2, the reprieve)
pps sartre changed tack after being and nothingness.
in 'search for a method' he comes up with a new
ontology that looks very similar to a DQ/sq model.
Mark 22-6-04: I'm not aware of this. Shall get a copy of this and read it
ASAP. Cheers.
I kind of read Nothingness in DQ terms and facticity in SQ terms in BN.
ppps i wrote a philosophy paper on sartre that
explores his work and its relationship to the MOQ.
will post it if i can find it.
Mark 22-6-04: Yes please. No rush - i have a Chomsky book on the go, but am
looking forward to reading your paper. Sounds very interesting. Please send it
along.
All the best,
Mark
>
>
> Dear Gav,
> I have been thinking about coherence for some time
> as a relationship of
> static patterns of Quality which best relates to DQ.
> (The sweet spot.) I have also
> been studying Sartre's Being and Nothingness and
> Simone DeBouviore's Ethics of
> ambiguity. (I don't know anything about the
> Situationsists apart from the odd
> comment made by fellow students and friends. I find
> Sartre fascinating and
> wish to learn more.)
>
> I feel there is a common thread moving through
> Pirsig, the situationists and
> my thinking regarding coherence. Do you feel this is
> worth pursuing?
> I especially feel that coherence taken as a term
> which describes high Quality
> SQ-SQ tensions forms an MOQ derived basis for
> situationist goals. It may be
> noticed that such goals are not structured in a SOM
> sense - they are aimed at
> high level coherence. Perhaps Guy Debord intuitively
> felt this when he wrote
> the above paragraphs?
> All the best,
> Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 22 2004 - 16:49:49 BST