> QUALITY, DYNAMIC QUALITY AND STATIC QUALITY.
>
> Go ahead!
Well what is there to say, what do you want to hear ?
Quality is the very base of the whole MOQ but although you can discuss MOQ
philosophocally, the only way to understand Quality is mystically. As with
all systems there is at least one premise you have simply to belief in - I
think Quality is such a premise, its the main dogma of the MOQ. When
someone asks: "what exactly is Quality ?" You can as well answer "God",
"It" or "Reality" as giving the definition that it is undefinable. The human
brain has a hard time when it tries to understand (and thus define) the
undefinable, maybe you just have to be a mystic to 'feel' what Quality is.
Then there are Dynamic Quality and Static Quality. After the world is
created by the first premise it has to be split in two to distinguish
anything. Because the MOQ tends to study this kind of splits (like the
famous object-subject and mind-matter split) it needs to have a different
split then any other system. By splitting reality in DQ and SQ the MOQ in
fact splits Quality on the edge of time -or- at the time of experience; all
things already expierenced are static, and therefor unchangable by them
selves, all thing yet to come or undetermined on the other hand are Dynamic.
Since almost any system studies and splits only the defined (as in static)
world in the study of patterns in SQ the MOQ is able to bridge the gaps made
by other systems (like SOM). Another virtue of the SQ-DQ split is the
recognition that not everything is (static) definable, so it is compatible
with things like the Heiselberg relation and relativity on one side but also
with a religious world view (although not with a very dogmatic religious for
MOQ dislikes dogmas by its very nature).
I think I made enough disputable statements so you may shoot.
Jaap
------- End of forwarded message -------
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:30 BST