Hi There
It's the beginning of the month, votes are in, and it's time to start discussion on the new topic,
which is:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
#3
What exactly is the solution to the subject-object schisma given by MOQ ?
We know that MOQ replaces the object-subject split with a static-dynamic split, but for
example the mind-matter relation is not clear (as turned out last months discussion). If MOQ
goes beyond SOM then it should be possible to describe SOM in terms of MOQ and thus
clearifying typical SOM problems.
I propose the folowing problems:
- Describe 'object' in terms of MOQ; which are its static parts, and which are its dynamic
parts ?
- Describe 'subject' in terms of MOQ; which are its static parts, and which are its dynamic
parts ?
- Describe the relation between subject and object in terms of MOQ, and show why the
object-subject split is denied by MOQ.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A few reminders (from the MOQ_Focus rules):
Members may post only one message every 24 hours (except for PROGRAM topic
suggestions and voting in last week of month).
Members must answer the program question in every post and must not pursue
topics that may distract from the program.
Members must express themselves clearly, concisely and courteously. They
should not use HTML email nor send attachments.
VOTING SUMMARY
#1
marble@inwind.it
aretelaugh@pacbell.net
horse@darkstar.uk.net
#2
a.j.lowry@att.net
j.g.karssenberg@student.utwente.nl
drobinson@ciit.org
#3
joelkotarski@hotmail.com
joao.silva@optimus.pt
buffinasia@hotmail.com
mjorgensen@vpdinc.com
mpkundert@students.wisc.edu
skutvik@online.no
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:31 BST