Re: MF static/dynamic & subject/object

From: 3dwavedave (dlt44@ipa.net)
Date: Tue Jul 10 2001 - 03:17:12 BST


Jonathan, Magnus, All

DAVE
> >the most appropriate MoQ subject/object split is right down the middle
JONATHAN
> Yes, yes and yes, but it's hardly new.
> The idea is documented in the archive 3 years ago!!!!!

I missed it, and my Wilbur/MoQ diagram was first circulated over a year
ago to less than any ah---hahs. I sometimes think we are all much better
at talking, than listening. And much worse at understanding than listening.

JONATHAN
> Is this idea now generally acceptable to all participants, or is it restricted
> to just the three of us?

It only took Pirsig 30 to 40 years to get it down, 10 or so for "The
Three Stooges" to make it big, and us, like petty felons, only 3 to 5 to
get a glimpse of insight. Now understanding the consequences of this, if
true, is fruit for further pondering.

3WD

PS. One of the things that kind of tweeked it for me was something that
one of the pioneers in quantum theory wrote in an essay Wilbur used in
'Quantum Questions". It was something like, a quantum event is "more
like a thought than a thing"

MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:31 BST