Kenny,
I brought this point up in a previous post: before debating on solutions, let's agree on the
problem and correctly state it; nonetheless, this thread of thought was buried in an explanation to
another member about the BBS "solution". Thanks for clearly summarizing the discussion in a _compact_
message with no other purpose but getting the problem straight. Also, by renaming the thread via
dropping a potential solution ("BBS"), it will maybe focus back on the essential problem.
> 1) MF posts were dying, MD posts were insanely prolific
>
> 2) We labeled the MF as suffering from static stagnance and the MD as suffering from a lack of static latches
>
> 3) We agreed that there needs to be more Dynamic in the MF and more static in the MD
>
> 4) General consensus seems to be that "One List to Rule Them All" is not what we want - some prefer the MF, others the MD, depending on our schedules and such
I'd only add:
5) Much of the Dynamic needs to be outlet to other channels that is not in a permanent log (private
mails? chat? tbd).
Now that you made this thread, perhaps we can focus this one on agreement by all of the fundamental
problem.. while the other existing one (or another to come) can explore suggested solutions instead
of waiting for agreement by all on the problems. Hopefully, in a matter of days, these two should
meet.
--s
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:34 BST