From: skutvik@online.no
Date: Tue Jan 20 2004 - 08:50:45 GMT
Hi Foci
18 Jan. Valence wrote:
> Right. If the point of the MoQ is to redescribe everything as a
> species of value then Pirsig got it plain backwards. What it should
> say is: "Phenomena are values." More to the point: 'Phenomena' are
> respectively: tactile values, visual values, auditory values,
> olfactory values, and (umm...) flavoritive(?) values.
I have been reluctant to enter this topic as it has its origin in the
SODAV paper - one that I don't have good vibes about. No
criticism of Rick for posting it or of those electing it. Anyway I
feel with Rick in his comment above (to Matt) about it sounding
backwards and should have said .....phenomena are values"
...even adding that all existence IS is sensing of value.
How could the inorganic level produce the biological one (or for
that matter: the inorganic world come to pass) if the patterns of
the respective planes didn't sense the Quality pull, The snag of it
all is that the human being is treated as in SOM: a body with
sense organs whose inputs are evaluated by a mind. This is
qualitywise wrong, there is no fifth or sixth biological sensory
perception of value. The static layers of which we consist are the
"sensing" ...phew everything tend to become in quotation marks,
bracketed or italicized . The MOQ not only redescribes: It writes it
in a new language that must be learned. But there was no way
that Pirsig could reach the Brussels' conference audience by
starting with the MOQ fundamentals?
I hear the rumbling from Matt's "pragmatic" machinery about the
inorganic level not being the starting point .... things start in the
mind ...etc. OK, Matt behaves so why start provoking him? ;-)
My conclusion is that the answer is "NO" to the actual question.
Sincerely
Bo
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_focus/
MF Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_focus follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/mf/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 20 2004 - 23:49:35 GMT