MF February Vote - 3-Way Tie

From: Horse (horse@darkstar.uk.net)
Date: Tue Feb 08 2005 - 01:09:52 GMT

  • Next message: Horse: "MF Discussion Topic for February 2005"

    Hi Folks

    We have a 3-way tie for the February vote. The votes were as follows:

    VOTING RESULTS

    Votes for topics
    1) 3
    2) 0
    3) 3
    4) 2
    5) 3
    6) 1

    Voters and Selection
    1)Lloyd Klinedinst, Valence, Horse
    2)
    3)Jay Casler, David Buchanan, Tim Ostroot
    4)sedrolle, Maggie Hettinger
    5)Hugo Masse, Marty Jorgensen, Matt Poot,
    6)Sam Norton,

    As I said in my Call for Votes post, if there was a tie I would select those that have tied
    and ask for a re-vote. I think two days should be sufficient to get enough votes in.
    PLEASE NOTE THE NUMBERS OF THE TOPICS HAVE BEEN CHANGED.
    PLEASE VOTE USING THE NUMBERS IN THIS EMAIL
    The topics for which a new vote is required are:

    1) "In the MOQ feeling corresponds to biological quality." (Pirsig in the
    Copleston annotations).
    I'd like to suggest we spend a bit of time trying to work out what "feeling"
    is, as referred to here, whether it's the same as "sensation" or "emotion",
    and if so, whether this analysis stands up to scrutiny in the light of
    contemporary understandings in the philosophy of mind and neuroscience.

    Sam Norton

    2) Topic suggestion: Is there a correlation between Nietzsche's
    "appolonian" versus "dionysian" and Pirsigs' division between SQ and DQ?
    Reading into some of Nietzsche's writing lately I tried to understand
    the way he uses the figure of the god Dionysus in his writings. Somehow
    I got the feeling that Dionysus is to Nietzsche what Dynamic Quality is
    to Pirsig. But I can't really prove this because the jargon is so very
    different. Are there other out there who have ideas on how to treat this
    kind of correlation? So my question is really two-fold:
      1) Is there a correlation?
      2) How can you "prove" such a correlation?

    Jaap Karssenberg

    3) Why has the MOQ FOCUS Forum been so detached from Dynamic Quality
    lately? I am thinking about the reasons for the two-month pause.
    Can that tendency be changed intentionally? That is to ask: Can one be linked to
    DQ intentionally, is there a program, an action plan, to do so?

    Hugo Masse

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_focus/
    MF Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_focus follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/mf/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 08 2005 - 01:24:54 GMT