LS Re: Principles - Update

Doug Renselle (renselle@on-net.net)
Mon, 19 Jan 1998 19:13:49 +0100

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Hugo Fjelsted Alroe: "LS Re: Principles - Update"
• Previous message: Doug Renselle: "LS Re: Principles - Update"

Magnus Berg wrote:
>
...
>
> What I lack in the principle is that DQ isn't always good. War,
> cancer, lost love are all results of DQ.
>
> Magnus
Magnus,

But this is human-centric. War is not in DQ-perspective bad. Cancer
may be an attempt by DQ on DNA to improve the genome, or extend the
lifetime of Homo sapiens. Often, more mature and exciting love
eventually replaces lost love.

If you say DQ is moral AND immoral, regardless how high we scale the
intellect of the sentient considering DQ's morality, then you are
asserting an uncertainty principle. I agree.

Doug Renselle.
> >

-- 
"The cause of our current social crises,..., is a genetic defect within
the nature of reason itself."
By Robert M. Pirsig, in 'Zen & the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance,' 
p. 102 (paperback), Bantam, 28th edition, May 1982.
--
post message - mailto:lilasqd@hkg.com
unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com
homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670
 






Next message: Hugo Fjelsted Alroe: "LS Re: Principles - Update"
Previous message: Doug Renselle: "LS Re: Principles - Update"







This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 
on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:42:38 CEST