Doug Renselle (renselle@on-net.net)
Mon, 30 Mar 1998 08:25:41 +0100
Hi Clark,
Hey, what's the problem? No, you are not going deaf!
Don't let the SOM anti-MoQ barrage get you down! This is only the
beginning. The battle of MoQ to subsume SOM is only in its infancy. We
have a long way to go, and it will not get easier as we proceed.
Just as we have seen, and just as Pirsig, et al., experienced -- SOM
perceives those in MoQ as insane. The classical scientists said/say the
same thing about quantum science, "That's insane! Unbelievable! It
makes no sense!" But it is BETTER; it works!
I have not been able to wade through all of last week's TLS posts, but I
think the MoQites in TLS have held their own against the first real
external SOM seige.
Rest assured that SOM is inherently weaker philosophically, ethically,
and scientifically than MoQ. Pirsig and the rest of us have shown that
well, plus we have quantum science as a benchmark. That is powerful
evidence of the better, new direction towards which the MoQ compass
points.
Mtty Clark,
Doug Renselle.
-- clark wrote: > > Squad, > The silence here is deafening. Am I going to have to attack the MOQ > to > get the conversation going again? I hope the squad is not shell > shocked. > Ken >-- The complementary view of truth is many truths which are contextual, and by being contextual they leave room for the good to rule. It is not objectivism, which has no place for the good, and it is not relativism, which has no place for truth.By Hugo Fjelsted Alroe in his email to The Lila Squad on 11 March 1998, 17:44 titled, "LS Re: Rambling on intellect and life."
-- post message - mailto:lilasqd@hkg.com unsubscribe/queries - mailto:diana@asiantravel.com homepage - http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/4670
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b3 on Thu May 13 1999 - 16:42:58 CEST