> The good part of LC in my opinion is that it can be the Static Intellectual
> Pattern, like Pirsig wrote.
> Yes, LC is quite dull, as are most intellectual Scientific Books. It doesn't
> Even Jimi Hendrix would not be able to explain E=MC2 well and also make it
> artistically Dynamic. Different kind of qualities, you know.
Oh how I disagree! Have you read Richard Dawkins on evolution? Steven Pinker on the workings of the mind? How about David Deutsh's
explanation of wave-light duality "Shadows"? It's one of the most beautiful pieces of writing I've ever read. Perfectly scientific
and perfectly artistic at the same time.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - email@example.com
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:01:16 BST