From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Mon Jun 14 2004 - 14:43:41 BST
On 14 Jun 2004 at 8:29, Wim Nusselder wrote:
If subject-object thinking can be integrated in the MoQ, why can't
Ayn Rand's Objectivism? If translated into 'high quality intellectual
patterns of value' (or lower quality, depending on what you compare
it with), we would get a more constructive type of discussion than in
this way.
msh says:
Sure, all kinds of ideas can be incorporated into the MoQ. However,
IMO, the most constructive type of discussion would ALWAYS keep in
view the distinction between theory and reality.
I agree with Platt that LILA provides textual justification for
saying that theoretical "Free Market" societies are in most ways
morally superior to "Socialialist" societies. The problem is that no
such "Free Market" societies exist. And never have. Any discussion
that fails to note this "reality" is, to put it politely, mental self-
gratification. This applies as well to Pirsig's discussion of the
issue, IMO.
Best to all,
Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
-- InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983 Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com "Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is everything." -- Henri Poincare' MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archives: Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 14 2004 - 14:49:26 BST