Re: MD Scientific Pantheism vs Cosmotheism

From: Paul Vogel (nitzke@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 17 1998 - 00:59:14 GMT


>From owner-moq_discuss@mill.venus.co.uk Tue Dec 15 20:32:15 1998
>Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
> by mill.venus.co.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) id EAA04282
> for moq_discuss-outgoing; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:30:59 GMT
>Received: from mail.netsites.net (mainserver.netsites.net
[207.2.194.130])
> by mill.venus.co.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id EAA04278
> for <moq_discuss@moq.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:30:56 GMT
>Message-Id: <199812160430.EAA04278@mill.venus.co.uk>
>Received: from pclark [207.2.194.176] by mail.netsites.net with ESMTP
> (SMTPD32-4.06) id A78C2970300; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 22:31:08 CST
>From: "Ken Clark" <clark@netsites.net>
>To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
>Subject: MD Scientific Pantheism
>Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 22:29:43 -0600
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Priority: 3
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1162
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Sender: owner-moq_discuss@venus.co.uk
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: moq_discuss@moq.org
>
>Paul,

Dear Ken,

> Pointed by my daughter I looked up Cosmotheist on the net. I didn't
much
>like the sound of that.

Cosmotheism is not " Politically Correct ", the way that Scientific
Pantheism is, but, Cosmotheism, is very intellectually honest, in a way
that, Scientific Pantheism, has not yet evolved towards, but it will,
and must. Reality will out, even if it is not liked very much, for the
Truth, can be ugly, but is of the Highest Value of The Good or
Excellence.

 I then looked at Scientific Pantheism and liked it
>a lot better.

Yes, Ken, it is much easier to swallow alot of half-truths, that are
just " Politically Correct ", than the Whole Truth, which may cause some
discomfort and may cause one to make some very difficult decisions and
judgements, that are just not very popular with the herd these days.
Intellectual Honesty, is very tough to come by lately for these very
reasons.

It looks like it is not incompatible with Pirsig"s ideas. I
>think SP embodies the sort of ideas that need to be more widely
>disseminated in the world.

I agree! Scientific Pantheism is only a stepping stone to the far Higher
Truths of Cosmotheism, which will always refuse to compromise its'
intellectual honesty and integrity, for the herds' popularity.

Cosmotheism will win out, Ken, and will become the predominant idea in
the world of the near future, especially if Pirsigs' MOQ is accepted, as
the new metaphysics, for this future. The Truth, always wins out, in the
long run, just given enough time.

Best regards,

Paul.

  Ken Clark
>
>
>
>homepage - http://www.moq.org
>queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
>unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
>body of email
>

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:45 BST