ROGER REPLIES ON EVIL TO BODVAR AND GLOVE:
To Glove:
You even sound like Doug Renselle! Actually he left before I joined, but I
like his web site, especially his book reviews.
As to your answers to the 5 questions of evil, I agree/disagree with your
answers/non answers from the perspective of the intellectual/many-truths
level. Sorry, I couldn't resist :-) I think you may have started a new thread
on the meaning of truth in a many truth pragmatic metaphysics........
To Bodvar:
Bo, I need to start with the statement that I think I am in agreement with
every thing you posted on the 19th..... except for one crucial statement. I am
not sure if I am misreading, misunderstanding, or what, but I don't understand
the following:
<<<<< But PLATT's latest input poses a
new riddle: the MOQ is based upon the axiom that there is nothing BUT
value which necessitates the opposite: low value, so to say that evil
is relative is plainly wrong. >>>>>
If you follow Platt, Struan and my thot processes through this thread, I
think you will see I have similar perspectives on the necessities of dualism
within the intellectual level. But why does it follow that "evil is relative
is plainly wrong"?
Am I missing something?
Rog
homepage - http://www.moq.org
queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in
body of email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:49 BST