Hej
Struan wrote:
> Naughty naughty !! I seem to remember synthesising a
> definition of SOM that most in the squad
> (myself not included) accepted.
Indeed you did, I was referring to the (myself not included) part.
> You (as you
> often do) want to forward a strict, discrete definition of
> it, at the expense of all others. I think
> (as I often do) that it is open to various interpretations,
> each one of which may be right in a
> particular context.
But such ambiguities leaves us open to misunderstandings which
not seldom leads to harsh words and name calling. Isn't it better
to get to know all interpretations and contexts, instead of
seeing just one? Otherwise, everyone will say the same words but
mean completely different things.
Magnus
MOQ Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mailing List Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Queries - mailto:moq@moq.org
Unsubscribe - mailto:majordomo@moq.org with
UNSUBSCRIBE MOQ_DISCUSS in the body of the email
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:02:50 BST