Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce

From: Scott R (jse885@spinn.net)
Date: Thu Aug 21 2003 - 15:58:18 BST

  • Next message: johnny moral: "Re: MD Intersubjective agreement"

    Squonk,

    This saddens you? Perhaps I can help. Here is how our "dialogue" just went.

    Me (to someone else): [something about the S/O divide]

    You: There are no subjects and objects in the MOQ. I sincerely want to help.

    Me: While I agree that subjects and objects are not primary, I nevertheless think that a philosophy is useless if it does not account for them, because of X, Y, and Z.

    You: Subjects and objects are not primary (plus the quote from ZMM on Poincare).

    Me: I AGREE with that. If you want to help, why don't you respond to my X, Y, and Z concerns?

    You: Apparently you haven't read ZMM and Lila. There are no subjects and objects in the MOQ.

    So do you see why I might have found your responses just a tad frustrating -- above all, the opposite of helpful?

    - Scott

    ----- Original Message -----

      squonk: If you want me to forget it i will.

      I do.

      - Scott

      Dear Scott,
      This saddens me a great deal.
      Wishing you all the best,
      squonk

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 21 2003 - 16:02:03 BST