Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce

From: Scott R (
Date: Thu Aug 21 2003 - 15:58:18 BST

  • Next message: johnny moral: "Re: MD Intersubjective agreement"


    This saddens you? Perhaps I can help. Here is how our "dialogue" just went.

    Me (to someone else): [something about the S/O divide]

    You: There are no subjects and objects in the MOQ. I sincerely want to help.

    Me: While I agree that subjects and objects are not primary, I nevertheless think that a philosophy is useless if it does not account for them, because of X, Y, and Z.

    You: Subjects and objects are not primary (plus the quote from ZMM on Poincare).

    Me: I AGREE with that. If you want to help, why don't you respond to my X, Y, and Z concerns?

    You: Apparently you haven't read ZMM and Lila. There are no subjects and objects in the MOQ.

    So do you see why I might have found your responses just a tad frustrating -- above all, the opposite of helpful?

    - Scott

    ----- Original Message -----

      squonk: If you want me to forget it i will.

      I do.

      - Scott

      Dear Scott,
      This saddens me a great deal.
      Wishing you all the best,

    MOQ.ORG -
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 -
    Nov '02 Onward -
    MD Queries -

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 21 2003 - 16:02:03 BST