Re: MD Pirsig and Peirce

Date: Thu Aug 21 2003 - 21:04:32 BST

  • Next message: MATTHEW PAUL KUNDERT: "Re: MD Chance and natural selection"

    > Me (to someone else): [something about the S/O divide]
    > You: There are no subjects and objects in the MOQ. I sincerely
    > want to help.
    > Me: While I agree that subjects and objects are not primary, I
    > nevertheless think that a philosophy is useless if it does not
    > account for them, because of X, Y, and Z.
    > You: Subjects and objects are not primary (plus the quote from ZMM
    > on Poincare).
    > Me: I AGREE with that. If you want to help, why don't you respond
    > to my X, Y, and Z concerns?
    > You: Apparently you haven't read ZMM and Lila. There are no
    > subjects and objects in the MOQ.
    > So do you see why I might have found your responses just a tad
    > frustrating -- above all, the opposite of helpful?

    Hey, wait. That looks like a half a dozen conversations _I've_ had with Squonk.


    MOQ.ORG -
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 -
    Nov '02 Onward -
    MD Queries -

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 21 2003 - 21:06:30 BST