From: Joe (jhmau@sbcglobal.net)
Date: Fri Aug 22 2003 - 20:49:40 BST
On 20 August 2003 5:55 PM Scott R writes:
Hi Scott,
Scott:
I have not before responded to your posts since I can't follow them. You
make a lot of strange claims without some backing, and go off from them on
paths I can't follow. For instance:
Joe:
I now have a word to describe the connection of DNA to consciousness. My
DNA, by definition contains the four orders, inorganic, organic, social, and
intellectual.
Scott:
Where did this definition come from? DNA is a chemical.
joe: i am not looking at the chemical analysis. I am looking at life
(organic, social, intellect) evolvinging from the inorganic order. DNA is
the smallest particle I thought of as a term to represent individual life.
In MoQ these orders are defined as different in a division of everything
into dyanmic or static quality, and this seems to be an accepted division
and definition.
Joe
My DNA emanates a field I call awareness.
Scott:
Why do you think this? Do all chemicals emanate an awareness field or just
DNA? If the latter, what makes DNA special?
joe: in reverse order, IMO DNA is special by being the smallest particle of
individual life. In order to be known all chemicals emanate to a receiving
brain. The emanation is latched into a pattern and a word is assigned. DNA
suggests a different connection to knowledge. One-celled organisms seek
food. Their activity is modified by something other than gravity. This
difference shows a capability (purpose) for identifying specific chemicals
necessary to their state. Other capabilities emanate from the inorganic
order creating a more complex organic (purpose), social (purpose, emotion),
intellectual (purpose, emotion, quality) orders. The more complex
individuals have a presence indicating a more complex field of awareness. A
DNA generated awareness field is the simplest explanation.
Why? I am trying to work out the implications of an instinctive sensing of
reality.
Scott:
"Consciousness or even sentience *cannot* evolve out of non-consciousness."
joe: that raises the bar pretty high for trying to describe how life
(conscious) and material (non conscious) are in the same universe. The word
'evolve' straddles the two universes. Emanation is the vehicle.
I am sorry for being obscure. Since MoQ is a recent observation, there are
not a lot of words that have an accepted meaning in describing its effects.
Joe
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 22 2003 - 20:59:37 BST