Hello everyone
Glenn wrote:
> Well, I don't know about 'contentious', but I'm not convinced the "MOQ is
an
> intellectual description of this mystical insight". After all, the insight
is
> that a large part of American values come from Indians. This seems pretty
far
> afield from the MOQ.
Is it? I think the difference between Indian culture and European culture is
crucial for MOQ. In European culture I never found anything like DQ, all
European systems are closed and don't leave any room for the undefinable.
( Even people like Eliphas Levi defend a complete split between philosophy,
religion and mysticism.)
I think the reason that the American culture so greatly influenced Europe
and the rest of western cultures is that the American culture has some
spirit wich is recognised but can't be described. This is some Dynamical
spirit brought in by the "Indian way of live".
Understanding this Dynamical spirit, wich I think is more Dynamical than the
intellectual level, is the very bases of MOQ.
>If the insight had been to split reality into SQ and DQ, I'd be more
enthusiastic about >your idea.
Visions don't come in this abstract words. If they did they would be of an
itellectual level and therefor ne longer mystic. I think you have to "feel"
DQ before you are able to understand the complete being of MOQ.
Greeting,
Jaap
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:19 BST