What exactly is the solution to the subject-object schisma given by MOQ ?
We know that MOQ replaces the object-subject split with a static-dynamic
split, but for example the mind-matter relation is not clear (as turned out
last months discussion). If MOQ goes beyond SOM then it should be possible
to describe SOM in terms of MOQ and thus clearifying typical SOM problems.
I propose the folowing problems:
- Describe 'object' in terms of MOQ; which are its static parts, and which
are its dynamic parts ?
- Describe 'subject' in terms of MOQ; which are its static parts, and which
are its dynamic parts ?
- Describe the relation between subject and object in terms of MOQ, and show
why the object-subject split is denied by MOQ.
Jaap
------- End of forwarded message -------
MOQ.org - http://www.moq.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 16:03:31 BST