From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Sat Dec 25 2004 - 04:32:20 GMT
Hi MOQers,
Merry (fill in your mythological preference) to all.
Just some general questions, not necessarily directed to Chin:
On 24 Dec 2004 at 21:47, Phaedrus Wolff wrote:
I've been thinking some about this. This is where my problem comes
with denying a religion, even if the religion is
suppressive/exclusive. You don't change a view by telling the viewer
they are wrong. You change the view by offering a better view;
showing how a higher Quality view is better.
msh asks:
Why is believing something that is false better than believing
nothing? IOW, why must you have something better to believe in, in
order to change your view? When presented with evidence
contradicting your belief, can't you simply suspend belief and begin
your own investigation?
Does the MOQ require maintenance of low quality static patterns just
because there's nothing better to replace them? What about mu?
Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
--
InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
"The shadows that a swinging lamp will throw,
We come from nowhere and to nothing go."
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Dec 25 2004 - 04:31:45 GMT