Re: MD What is a living being?

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Sat Apr 26 2003 - 13:16:40 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD the quality of eliminating taxes"

    Hi Paul:
     
    > I think you misunderstood my point. I understand the
    > statements, as I understand the MoQ. It's not the
    > statements in isolation I have trouble with, its when
    > you add them together that I have a problem.
    >
    > What do you think of the conclusions I have drawn, can
    > you come to any other conclusion without adding to or
    > changing the statements?
    >
    > a) Lila is not a living being
    >
    > b) Living beings are not static patterns of value, in
    > which case they must be Dynamic Quality
    >
    > c) Living beings are both static and Dynamic Quality
    > which means Lila is in some sense the source of all
    > things, and is evolving toward herself
     
    Lila is a living being composed of static patterns of value with the ability
    to respond to DQ.

    DQ is the "source of all things."

    I have no idea where you got a) and b). Are they statements or
    conclusions?

    What am I missing?
     
    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 26 2003 - 13:17:57 BST