From: Valuemetaphysics@aol.com
Date: Fri Oct 10 2003 - 12:51:37 BST
In a message dated 10/10/03 9:22:07 AM GMT Daylight Time, skutvik@online.no
writes:
> The reason I say this that you - at least
> - seem to understand what direction I want the MOQ to move.
Dear Bo,
This has been said a number of times, but i feel it is the best way to
progress:
You already have a metaphysics. Your metaphysics does not coincide with that
of the MoQ, therefore, it would be better for you to talk exclusively from the
view of your own metaphysics and contrast this with the MoQ.
This way individuals may value the MoQ, or value Bo's metaphysics according
to their respective preferences.
It is unhelpful for your to say, 'At least you understand...' to Paul, as if
Paul, or indeed anyone else, can change the MoQ for you. That cannot be done.
The MoQ is understood and agreed upon by too many people for you to have an
effect. Another way of saying this is to say that too many people understand
Bo's metaphysics for you to have an effect. (I urge you to reflect upon recent
posts by Wim, Dan, Paul, Platt, RMP, myself....) Insisting only a select few
intellectual chiefs share a perch upon a lofty plato with you will not change a
thing.
Ideas are artistic creations of the Human intellect. Gods, protons, sine
arcs, subjects, objects, dharma... All fictions in response to Quality. Intellect
cannot be a product of its own inventions.
You are saying, 'Intellect is the product of Human ideas.'
Mark
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 10 2003 - 12:53:06 BST