Re: MD MOQ and idealism

Date: Fri Oct 10 2003 - 12:51:37 BST

  • Next message: Patrick van den Berg: "Re: MD Re: MOQ:What is a person."

    In a message dated 10/10/03 9:22:07 AM GMT Daylight Time,

    > The reason I say this that you - at least
    > - seem to understand what direction I want the MOQ to move.

    Dear Bo,
    This has been said a number of times, but i feel it is the best way to
    You already have a metaphysics. Your metaphysics does not coincide with that
    of the MoQ, therefore, it would be better for you to talk exclusively from the
    view of your own metaphysics and contrast this with the MoQ.
    This way individuals may value the MoQ, or value Bo's metaphysics according
    to their respective preferences.

    It is unhelpful for your to say, 'At least you understand...' to Paul, as if
    Paul, or indeed anyone else, can change the MoQ for you. That cannot be done.
    The MoQ is understood and agreed upon by too many people for you to have an
    effect. Another way of saying this is to say that too many people understand
    Bo's metaphysics for you to have an effect. (I urge you to reflect upon recent
    posts by Wim, Dan, Paul, Platt, RMP, myself....) Insisting only a select few
    intellectual chiefs share a perch upon a lofty plato with you will not change a

    Ideas are artistic creations of the Human intellect. Gods, protons, sine
    arcs, subjects, objects, dharma... All fictions in response to Quality. Intellect
    cannot be a product of its own inventions.
    You are saying, 'Intellect is the product of Human ideas.'


    MOQ.ORG -
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 -
    Nov '02 Onward -
    MD Queries -

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Oct 10 2003 - 12:53:06 BST