Re: MD SQ-SQ coherence and the Biosphere.

From: Jim Ledbury (jim.ledbury@dsl.pipex.com)
Date: Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:13:04 GMT

  • Next message: Joe: "Re: MD quality religion"

    Valuemetaphysics@aol.com wrote:

    > Hi Jim,
    > Thanks for an interesting post.
    > You addressed the contrast between the scientific world view and the
    > MoQ to some extent. I appreciate this, because the MoQ is what i am
    > here for!
    > The issue of diversity - /what ever the level of evolution/ - is
    > interesting, because it seems that diversity does not automatically
    > lead to chaos. Coherent diversity is, in my view, a significant aspect
    > of the MoQ - it is evidence of the goal of evolution as Dynamic
    > Quality. (Lila.)
    >
    > So, to dismiss diversity is to basically not think in terms of the
    > MoQ, and that is why i pointed out that there would appear to be no
    > scientific law which says that diversity must be maintained, while the
    > MoQ, on aesthetic grounds, does; On aesthetic grounds, because beauty
    > may be fruitfully described as a coherent patterned relationship with
    > DQ. And the more patterns participating in coherence, the more severe
    > the coherence - the more evolved it is and therefore closer to DQ.
    >
    > All the best,
    > Mark.

    Hi Mark,

    I appreciate the acknowledgment.

    I am unsure about the quality of diversity per se. This seems to me to
    be a justification for a lot of BritArt which I find - um - pointless.
    Okay, in this sphere (intellectual) I dislike the art but I will defend
    their right to produce it. I think I am supportive of diversity, but
    with qualifications.

    Diversity in biological terms means plenty of things. We need this, but
    diversity in disease? Well this one is being played out on many diverse
    levels: intellectual, social and biological. I'm thinking of the
    current todo with multiple disease jabs for kids here (MMR) which is a
    media long runner in Britain, perhaps elsewhere.

    But then, maybe diversity to MOQ-Discuss is a tad unwelcome ;-)

    All the best, and thanks again
    Jim

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 19 2004 - 19:15:49 GMT