From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Thu Apr 22 2004 - 14:41:09 BST
Hi Mark,
>I feel you assume it is imperative for freedom to be
> available all the time. I disagree, for to grasp what coherence is, is to
> see a relationship between DQ and SQ which balances order and freedom in
> such a way as to touch Unity.
Unity is static. Balance is static. To get locked into a static position
is not good. As I've said before, I don't buy all of your 'coherence'
theory for reasons outlined in previous posts. No point in going around
that barn again.
> So, if patterned experience is to be accommodated in the
> best and most appropriate way, would you agree that this may be achieved in
> the pursuit of excellence?
Pursuing excellence is an excellent way to live. But, it can't be done if
you're satisfied with being in a state of static 'balance' and 'unity.'
Pursuit of something better means you're presently in a state of
discontent.
Best regards,
Platt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 22 2004 - 14:58:00 BST